Sons of Shem
Noah’s Semitic Legacy
Origins of Judaism, Christianity and Islam
Noah sacrifices after the flood (Joseph Anton Koch, 1768-1839)
Deep history
This is a history of a culture. Of people
who gave rise to three religions that control humanity, the Abrahamic triad Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Three members of
a family of religions who for centuries now, millenniums, are at loggerheads as befits an intense family. A history of hurt
and humiliation, of rejection and turned backs, thrusting a dagger therein. A history of curses and cull, contained in
formalities and dimensions that continue to remain unchanged to this day - now there is tradition for you. A history of
images, imagery, the imaginary and iconoclasm. Of the desire to know the highest. It is therefore the history of people with
a broken heart, people who need the truth so badly, people who therefore will fiercely defend that truth with fire and sword
needing to promulgate it while annihilating those who will not recognize it.
Now then, are we then not our brother’s keeper? Are not we responsible or at least partly responsible for what befalls our
fellowmen? Yes, of course, when this contains it is everyone’s responsibility to avoid anything that may harm anyone else.
No, certainly not, because no one else save you is answerable for walking your own path. For how profound the truth you have
learned may be, that truth only applies to you - it is your unalienable share of the truth. There is absolutely no use, it
never had and it will never have, in propagating the truth according to you. Simply make sure that the truth you have found
allows you not to harm anyone or anything - that already is a big ask. The urge to harm usually comes from the damages oneself
have suffered - the pain of lost love. It therefore makes absolutely no sense to seek the truth from and thereby be kept by your
brother or sister. In fact, you invite them therewith to harm you. The truth everyone is looking for is not found outside of you,
but exclusively in you. Your lost love can only be found there, how unsure you are whether you can handle the inner journey - yet,
only the first step on your road proves to be arduous.
The mother of all religions
Science has long assumed the exodus of man
from Africa has passed through the western part of Asia, the Levant. The genus Homo Sapiens, the Cro-Magnon subspecies, has
indeed used this route to the rest of the world north of the Red Sea, as long as the climate
permittedlink-note1).
This migration route, however, knew more climatic limitations than the one via the Bab El Mandeb, the crossing from Djibouti to Yemen on the south side of the Red Sea, the main route.
The groups that migrated in the north from Africa through the Levant, there made contact with the genus Homo Neanderthalensis,
as excavations in the Jebel Qafzeh cavern2)point out. In another cave near Tabun, and not far away from there in the Skhul Cave and also in Amud, discoveries have been
dated 40,000 to 15,000 years ago. Findings that suggest that Sapiens and Neanderthalensis did not just live there subsequently,
but also simultaneously, including in cohabitation - obvious hybrids are found. That was also the conclusion after excavations
outside the Levant in Shanidar in northern Mesopotamia and in Jebel Irhoud in the Maghreb. Outside the Afro-Asian territory
Sapiens Neanderthal hybrids have been discovered in Portugal and Romania.
This indicates all overlooking a mixture of one part of the population of Sapiens with Neanderthal, the Neanderthals, however,
numerically outnumbered. Obviously Sapiens did not regard, as in later times, Neanderthal as a hideous half-ape, but as a
fellowman. About the rituals and the religion of these people nothing is known, other than what is to be expected, the adoration
and invocation of natural forces and nature gods.
In the period following the Palaeolithic, the Neolithic, the humans in the Levant have left more than just their bones, for
example, their ceramics. In the Middle East the Neolithic lasts from about 12,000 to circa 3,000 bce3).
In and around the Fertile
Crescent, the area that roughly covers Egypt and Mesopotamia, and all the coastal country in between, at the beginning of the
Neolithic a form of ancestor worship was practised. Ancestors were buried under the house and even under the bed. On the skulls
of the dead faces were reshaped in clay, as found at Tell Aswad, Syria. In this way, the honoured ancestors were present with
the living and could be involved in important decisions. Large plaster ancestor statues were found in Ain Ghazal, Jordan. In
some places human remains, often with animal remains, were buried between the walls of the house. Only later, the dead were
buried outside the settlement.
A more as such formulated form of religion,
as far as can be determined, surfaced for the first time around 7,000 bce in Mesopotamia, believed to have arisen initially
in the social upper class of society. Statuettes dated to that period depict the Great Mother or the Mother Goddess with
undeniable and pronounced sexual characteristics. In the early religious history of the Middle East the Mother Goddess is
the most common revered figure. One and the same goddess comes under different names: Astarte in Assyria, Ishtar -also known
as Ashtoreth or
Asherah
Ashtoreth
Isis
Ishtar
Asherah- in
Akkâd, Ašerdu to the Hittites and Isis in Egypt - later, we meet her as Aphrodite to the Greeks and to the Romans as Venus,
but also, in a derivative form, as Mary with the Christian Roman Catholics. In Canaan -in Akkâdic: “Ki-na-ah-num”- Asherah
-Ishtar or Ashtoreth- was revered in the cities of Ugarith, Sidon and Tyrus. Asherah was the consort of the god El. Therefore,
Asherah was also called Elat, the feminine form of El - a name whose root word even in modern Hebrew means to struggle or rule.
The word "ha asherah" -not capitalized- means pillar or pole, a symbol associated with the cult of the Canaanite Mother Goddess.
This word was also the name of the sacred tree of life.
Usually there were two such trees in front of a temple of
Asherah4).
Ašerim was also the Egyptian word for the fig tree and in ancient Egypt was regarded as "the body of the Queen on Earth."
Here on the one hand probably is a connection between the two obelisks that always stood in front of every Egyptian temple,
as the two trees before the Asherah Temple, and on the other hand the fig tree or the Tree of Life in the Paradise of Adam
and Eve from the ancient books of the triad - the Tanakh, Bible and Koran.
Apart from Elat, Asherah was also known as Ba’alat. The Ba’alat or mistress in the early matriarchal society was the leader
of the tribe, the people. In order to secure offspring and thus of a successor, the Ba’alat had a new Ba’al as companion each
year. Ba’alat was associated with and symbolized by a lion, an animal that was seen as very powerful. Ba’al was associated with
and symbolized by a bull, a symbol of power and potency throughout the ancient world.
In Semitic Canaanite matriarchal society the ruler derived his power from his mistress, not the other way around as in a
patriarchal society. Possessions such as houses, lands and boats, were the property of the woman, the mistress, whichever
Ba’al she had at her side. Moreover, it is obvious that in matrilineal societies lands and houses were seen as the possession
of the woman. The role of the man was traditionally that of the hunter-herder and the traditional role of women was that of
the gatherer - plants and roots for consumption and as medicine. The development of agriculture, from about 8,500 bce in the
area of the fertile crescent, is logically linked to the traditional economic role of women. Along the path of agricultural
development women gained their power base.
In any culture of man a distinctive master,
or mistress in this case, often is celebrated already during life and well into his or her death, considered as special and
godsend, as sent by the gods. A development further, often one or two generations later, and the person as sent by the gods
him- or herself is deified, while the stories about that person become ever more grandiose, legendary and mythical. Another
step further and the tribal ruler in the course of generations is seen as the goddess, complete with worship, with stories
and myths, and a priestly class to maintain and perpetuate the system. In the case of Asherah the priestly class consisted
of temple priestesses, who later in more patriarchal times were ascribed a reputation far more negative as temple prostitutes -
a yearly fresh Ba’al became each youth initiated by them.
In the old books of the Abrahamic triad -Tanakh, Bible and Koran- for these religions the image was created of a pure
monotheistic religion with Yahweh, God the Father or Allah as the sole God. A representation which, as will be discussed
further on, is in need of essential differentiation. Asherah -Elat- and El were still revered in Jerusalemvideo
1) in the Old
Testament times deemed monotheistic5).
Further on it will be shown that the origin of monotheistic Judaism was an intellectual creation. In daily life, people long
continued to worship the other older gods - actually, they were polytheistic. Old habits die slowly, such as ancestor worship
has long persisted as the worship of the Mother Goddess got in vogue, like Elat and El -Ba’alat and Ba’al- were honoured as
Jehovah, God the Father and Allah became the only god. However, the supremacy of the single god marked the end of the matriarchy
and the new dominance of patriarchy.
From Palaeolithic times is noteworthy as the
most special element found, the partial blend between Neanderthal and Sapiens. Although more examples of mixing in this part
of the world are found than elsewhere, it is impossible to determine whether it was widely diffused, or in absolute proportions
a sporadic phenomenon.
These Palaeolithic people practised a form of ancestor worship, though it is
not entirely impossible that they also already worshipped the Mother
Goddess, as the European Venus of Willendorf is dated more than 20,000 bce. No findings in the Levant
are made that can substantiate such an age there.
The first real evidence for the worship of the Mother Goddess dates from the
period after the Palaeolithic, the Neolithic - from 12,000 bce onward. In the fertile crescent she is worshipped as Asherah, although there are many local variations on her
name known, such as Ba’alat or Elat. The fact that Asherah took a new Ba’al or El as consort, shows that early society in this
region was organized along a matrilineal line.
Inheritance through the female line is very likely related to the development of agriculture, through which the economic power
base of society was in the hands of women. The end of the matriarchal society and the transition to the patriarchal is accompanied
by the transition to the first Abrahamic religion. That being a present day Jew is inherited through the maternal line, may be an
ancient remnant of matrilineal society.
This too brief overview of the Palaeo-and Neolithic in the Middle East leaves remaining one as yet undiscussed topic, an event
of unparalleled importance for the triad Judaism, Christianity and Islam, the floodvideo
2).
The water covers the world
In every part of the world flood
stories are told. Can this wide spreading be seen as evidence for an actual disaster that engulfed the whole world? Once the
world has been a big snowball, just during the period that life developed more complex than single-celled. For the snowball
Earth hypothesis, which states that the earth 650-600 million years ago has been covered with glacial ice to the tropics,
sufficient scientific evidence is availablevideo
3).
No scientific evidence whatsoever exists for a deluge that at one time covered the whole earth with water. Data used to prove
a global flood happened anyway is believed only by creationists, within a theory that is no theory in the proper sense - a
hypothesis with evidence. Grounds for a torrent of water are found throughout the world, but only regionally, within local
cultures that physically had to do with the end of the last glacial period. That end of the last glacial is precisely determined
to 9.711 bce6).
The warming of the Earth thereafter went very quickly, geologically speaking. The end of the last Ice Age was not a global event,
but locally felt around the world. Sometimes a series of linked events, as we shall see, rather than one great event. No
waterworld.
A second relativistic preliminary remark regarding flood stories is about the notion world and noting what the world is. The
best known flood story tells about the inundation of "the entire world". What is meant with entire world? The answer depends
on the knowledge of the world and hence information and education. The date of September 6, 1522 in this context represents the watershed moment of quintessential change. It was the date the Basque
Juan Sebastián Elcanoillustration arrived home after as the first man on earth
having circumnavigated the globe. He was the first man who could actually claim, though still fragmentary, that he had seen the
entire world. He sailed on one of the ships of Fernão de Magalhães, Magellan, a Portuguese in Spanish service. However, de
Magalhães died during this first world voyage, so Elcano, or del Cano, really became the first man who travelled around the
world - plus of course the crew of de Magalhães' only remaining ship, the Victoria. After this epic voyage the notion of world
and the actual image of the world of man continually was expanded and refined, until finally a global perception arose.
Before the caesura of 1522 the worldview of a person was linked to where he was born. Alexander the Great extended this view
on the world as seen from Western perspective, drastically to the east, to India, as the Romans did to the west and north.
Genghis Khan ruled the largest empire ever. But for all of them the world was mainly their world. For someone who probably
lived about six thousand bce north of Mesopotamia, as Noah and his family did, that part of the world was the world, at any
rate north of Mesopotamia - perhaps
slightly expanded through trade contacts. A resident of the northern part of Mesopotamia
who saw his part of the world completely devastated did not know better than that the whole world was flooded and destroyed.
When the protagonist of the flood story would have proclaimed, "My world has been destroyed", he would have been correct. That
was nowhere near the world the later readers of the Abrahamic books knew. In fact, it is a strange phenomenon that people in
later better informed times for the sake of a belief prefer the more limited knowledge of past times, to be able to live in
accordance with their religion, but that aside.
It happens quite often that people confuse
a temporal connection with a causal relation. Events that happen almost simultaneously or in -rapid- succession do not
necessarily have a cause-effect relation. In fact, this relation more often does not exist that it does. That in several
places in the world flood stories exist, is related to the effects on several distinct parts of the world of the melting of
the ice cap at the end of the last ice age. That is as far as the common cause goes. There was no global innundation. Per
region the magnitude of the flooding and the nature of the consequences differ. This also includes whether the effects of the
flooding were permanent or temporarily. In many cases the land flooded, but was dry again when in several days the water was
drained. In some other cases the effects were permanent, to this day.
Atrahasis
and Gilgamish
The Atrahasis epic is an ancient
Babylonian epic chiefly known because of the flood story it tells. This flood story is broadly the same as on the eleventh
tablet of the Gilgamish epic and that in its turn shows great similarities to the later flood story in the Jewish Tanakh,
the Christian Old Testament and the Muslim
Koran7).
In brief, the Atrahasis epic reads as follows. The universe is divided into three parts. The god
Anum reigns in heaven, the
god Enlil on earth and the god Enki in the subterranean water.
Enlil forces the lesser Igigi gods in doing all the work, but
after forty years they revolt and besiege the temple of Enlil at Nippur. The god Enki suggests creating people who then can do
all the work. Together with the Mother Goddess this plan is executed. At some point in time, however, there are so many people
that their noise keeps the god Enlil from sleeping. He decides to send the people a plague, helped by the god Namtar. Thanks to
the pious man Atrahasis though, after a while Namtar stops the plague. Eventually, the people again make too much noise to the
liking of Enlil. This time he punishes them with a famine. Man survives this too. Then Enlil resolves to more drastic measures.
He sends a flood to the people. Atrahasis builds a reed ark so he, with his family and some animals, is able to survive the flood.
What became known as the Gilgamish epic originally was a frame narrative, in which stories about Bilgames and Enkidu were
recorded. In the 18th century bce a more cohesive epic was created under the name "Shutur eli sharri", he rises high above
all kings, when the text was translated from Sumerian into Akkadian. In the 12th century bce the text saw further editorial
changes and the story of the flood was added to the epic for the first time. The integral narration was renamed as "Sha nagba
inuru", he who has seen it all.
The story of the flood, on the eleventh tablet of the Epic of Gilgamish, is told by a certain Utnapishtim. Utnapishtim or
Uta-Napištim, Sumerian for "Him who is living", in Akkadian also known as Atrahasis, "the very wise". The ancient flood story
therefore was told to Gilgamish by none other than Atrahasis himself -
Gilgamish was his distant descendent. Atrahasis-Noah was
immortalized by marrying the Goddess who brought forth the water of life - presumably the Mother Goddess Ishtar. Whichever text
one further endeavours to study, the Gilgamish epic, or the texts of the Abrahamic religions, in mythical-religious context this
is all that can be known about Noah, Atrahasis8). Who Atrahasis or Noah really was, if he existed at all, can only be sketched on the basis of possibilities and probabilities9).
One of the most unlikely possibilities portrays Noah as a representative of intelligent extraterrestrial beings, or else a man
who was instructed by extraterrestrial intelligent beings, with knowledge of the impending catastrophe. The ark was not a wooden
ship, but a spaceship not wherein all the creatures of the world, but the dna of all creatures in the world was saved for after
the disaster. This story is not implausible, because there is a role for extraterrestrial intelligence to play, but because the
tale in question is and the people who put forward this hypothesis are credible in a way that cannot be verified. So, completely
unconvincing. In itself, the existence of extraterrestrial intelligence is not unrealistic, if only because of the statistical
chance. Out of a hundred billion stars our galaxy alone is believed to harbour ten billion habitable planets. The problem,
however, lies in the fact that suspected contact between humans and extraterrestrial intelligent life, not only in this case,
is ambiguous, without for any of the interpretations irrefutable evidence present. Not the story is incredible, but the hard
evidence for it is lacking.
Atrahasis, or Noah, thus exists within a religious context and within a mythological context, but within the
historical context his existence is probably unprovable. Noah may have really existed, but he can also be a created character
in whose life story the flood was embedded. Alongside the comparison the personification is a style element used in many
religions. The answer to the question whether Noah existed or not, also depends on the answer to the much more interesting
question, was there a flood? That last question is easier to answer and for the answer must be sought in the area where the
Atrahasis epic originates. That was probably Mesopotamia, but also a relatively wider area has to be considered.
In this area people lived, including a man with his family, someone who might be called Atrahasis, or Noah. Miraculously, he
survived a deluge and he thanked his god for it.
Even more water
There is no evidence of a global
flood. Only evidence for regional disasters exists. Each one was caused by the melting of ice masses at the end of the last
glacial. Both areas in the north inhabited by people in the earliest settlements there, as areas which were inhabited by
people in more advanced cultures in the subtropics. In the search for the flood that may have guided the story of the deluge
in the Gilgamish epic and in the triad of Abrahamic religions, a wide choice of regional floodings is available. Which of them
indeed stand alone and which may be associated with the story that was told in Mesopotamia. The location of the water cannot be
searched for too far, because the world of the Neolithic, as we saw, was not much larger than in this case the north of the
fertile crescent. This under the assumption that indeed a flood occurred.
The rise of sea levels caused by melting
glaciers had two appearances. The first was the gradual increase. Many coastal areas globally were increasingly threatened
by rising sea levels, without a catastrophic disaster being imminent. Concerning a now flooded area between the United
Kingdom and mainland Europe it is reported that the height of the rise in sea level occurred with about the size of a pebble
a year. Catastrophic flash floods, the other form, however, have occurred throughout the world and had devastating effects.
A well-documented example of a sudden deluge is found in western North America in the case of the "Channelled Scablands10)
that formed when "Glacial Lake Missoula11)
poured out onto the land to the south. In this example, the melting glacier water collected behind an ice dam. A not uncommon
phenomenon - in Iceland, this process still can be observed. The ice dam that retained "Glacial Lake Missoula" was two thousand
feet high. Weak spots in the dam were eroded away by meltwater, and eventually the dam was unable to stop the nearly five
thousand square miles glacial lake. Eventually the ice dam succumbed to the outside pressure. More than two thousand two
hundred cubic miles of water were released at once and flooded the "Camas Prairie Valley", the "Channelled
Scablands"video 4).
This phenomenon at this site has occurred not once, but probably forty times over a period of two thousand years between 13,000 and 11,000 bce. The outflow of the glacier water is situated in western North America and most likely that water
drained into the Pacific Ocean. It is likely that these events have led to local flood myths, but on the whole the global
influence of the outflow of the glacial lake is reflected mainly in the gradual rise of the oceans. Moreover, the last time
this geological phenomenon occurred is twice as far back in time than the time at which the flood story of Noah, Atrahasis,
it is believed to have occurred. So, no candidate for the origins of the
Abrahamic flood story.
This is different with another flood on the North American continent, the outflow of "Lake Agassiz" into the Atlantic Ocean12).
Glacial "Lake Agassiz" was at its greatest in magnitude larger than the current three Great Lakes in North America combined.
Like "Lake Missoula", "Lake Agassiz" at least partially emptied several times, of which at least once in the Arctic Ocean. The
largest area the lake has reached was 275,000 square miles, larger also than any present day lake or inland sea. The last time
"Lake Agassiz" again filled with glacier water was from about 7,900 bce and emptied for the last time almost completely in about 6,400 bce into the Atlantic, probably in less time than a year -see
also: Glacial Lakes World Wide.
This had drastic consequences for the whole planet. The exact impact of the outflow of "Lake Agassiz" is assessed differently
by different geologists, but a global rise in sea levels by at least forty inches seems likely. The outpouring of freshwater
into the salty ocean had also effect on the warm Gulf Stream, with a major climate change as result. In one study13), this event around 6,400 bce is linked to the spread of agriculture from the Near East to the west of Europe. There are also
several studies exploring the possibility that this event is associated with various flood myths.
Doggerland14)
and
video 5),
the Stone Age Atlantis, is named after the Dogger Bank, an increase in the current seabed in the southern North Sea -see
the red outline in the inset- where fishermen regularly find mammoth bones and other ancient
artefacts as bycatch in their
nets. The Dogger Bank was the very last area of land that until at least 5,000 years bce came out rising above sea level.
Before, the landscape of Dogger Land had been tundra, taiga and boreal forest, with deciduous trees to the south and with
settlements of people who lived permanently in this Neolithic almost Eden. It connected mainland Europe with the current
United Kingdom. Sea level at the time of Dogger Land depicted on the above photo was about 400 feet below the present
sea level. On the southern plains of Dogger Land the Thames, the Rhine, the Meuse and the Scheldt came together to flow as
one big wide river slowly through the endless lowlands of what is now the Channel, finally to flow into the Atlantic Ocean
to the south. Before Dogger Land finally disappeared under water, it had an undulating landscape with many meandering rivers,
streams, ponds and lakes. With the gradually rising sea levels, large parts of coastal area became wetlands. As a result of
the outflow of "Lake Agassiz" Dogger Land got marshy and virtually submerged.
The final demise of Dogger Land, however, came from a secondary consequence of the melting of the glaciers in the north.
Because less and less ice rested on the Scandinavian earth crust, the lesser weight caused this part of the Eurasian tectonic
plate to heave. In it’s turn this caused around 6,200 at the edge of the continental shelf 60 miles of the Scandinavian coast
an undersea landslide, the last of three, known as the "Storrega landslide". Traces of the subsequent tsunami can still be found,
with deposited sediment being discovered in Montrose Basin, the Firth of Forth -Scotland-, up to 50 miles inland and 15 feet
above current normal tide levelsvideo
6). The huge tidal wave that resulted from the "Storrega landslide" was the event that separated
Britain and mainland Europe. There were irreversible catastrophic consequences for the coastal areas around the
southern North Sea and the Neolithic population in this once prosperous area - everything was engulfed by water.
The Mediterranean region also experienced
the effects of rising sea levels. The part of the Mediterranean Sea whereto part of this introduction specifically is
concentrated is the land bridge that connected Europe with Asia, the Bosporus area. Today it is a sea strait, but around 6,000 bce this area formed a land connection of about 19 miles wide between the European and Asian parts of now Turkey.
In practical terms, this Bosporus Dam fulfilled the same function as the ice dams that blocked off the waters of "Lake Missoula"
and "Lake Agassiz". The Bosporus Dam prevented the rising waters of the Mediterranean flowing into the lower Black Sea. Here
and there some water did spill over the Bosporus Dam in the form of minor waterfalls. The bottom of the Black Sea shows traces
of the consequent erosion that show the Coriolis effect. The water seeped over the dam, then flowed along the south coast of
the former Black Sea, counterclockwise due to the rotation of the earth. Whether the Bosporus Dam in the long run would have
succeeded in restraining the rising Mediterranean water is a question that must remain unanswered, as yet another catastrophe
caused a flood.
Mount Etna in Sicily was also in ancient times a very active volcano and around 5,800 bce the site of a rare cataclysm. An
eruption of exceptional size destabilized the entire eastern flank of the volcano the size of over twenty cubic miles and
dumped this into the Mediterranean, with a huge tidal wave for the Eastern Mediterranean as
result15).
The south coast of present
day Turkey, of Syria, Lebanon and Israel and the coast of Egypt, were the hardest hit by the tsunami. Part of the tidal wave
swept north of Crete towards the Bosporus Dam. The sudden influx of water caused the Bosporus Dam to collapse and the higher
water level of the Mediterranean to gush into the much lower Black Sea.
A tidal wave or tsunami can have disastrous effects, even at great
distance. The “Sunda tsunami”, the second largest ever in the area, resulted in 230,000 casualties. Most in Sumatra, but also
many in Thailand, Myanmar, Bangladesh, India, Sri Lanka and across the Indian Ocean in Madagascar and even on the east coast of
Africa. A much larger tsunami, some geologists say, is waiting to happen due to the sliding into the ocean of the western flank
of the “Cumbre Viejo”, an old but still active volcano on La Palma, one of the Canary Islands. About 310 cubic miles of rock,
approximately 1,200 billion tons, then will collapse into the Atlantic Ocean with a mega-mega-tsunami as result and devastation
on the other side of the Atlantic, the entire eastern seaboard of the Americas, potentially causing millions of victims.
A tsunami is lethal. With the now rising sea levels, the "La Palma tsunami” may have the same impact on the eastern coast of
the Americas as the "Storrega tsunami” had on Dogger Land. Some land will disappear, other parts will change into wetlands.
The "Etna tsunami" brought comparable devastation in the eastern Mediterranean basin and the Bosporus Dam collapsed,
water occupying
the Black Sea.
The deluge the facts
On close inspection, the breaking of the
Bosporus Dam is not yet definite proof for any disaster which directly can serve as a basis for Noah’s flood story. Just as,
despite an almost continuous search, there is not yet any evidence for the existence of Homer's Atlantis, or the separating
of the Red Sea by Moses after the Jewish Exodus from Egypt. The way the stories of these times in the days themselves were
told and written, is completely different from the way modern man wants to read his reports. Modern man wants a clear distinction
between facts and opinions and moralities, he does not appreciate. Those who fail to keep this simple rule, is considered at
least a bad writer. Contrarily, until the beginning of modernity, the beginning of the Enlightenment mid-17th century, the
moralistic lesson or the educational aspect of a text was the positively charged part of the text. This was a long-standing
tradition that is also found for instance in the Abrahamic texts. Also for this reason, in none of the ancient texts other
than by chance, verifiable factual clues can be found - it was all about morality, the wise lesson and honouring the all-powerful
God.
Nevertheless, there are natural phenomena that can be designate to possibly have caused Noah’s flood. No global flood, but
regional episodes of a series of deluges that hit several places the world over - it has been demonstrated. The most likely
region where the flood story must have occurred -Mesopotamia, or northern Mesopotamia or north of Mesopotamia-, the most
obvious candidate natural phenomenon, is the catastrophic flooding of the Black Sea.
The Black Sea has two coastlines. The
freshwater coastline and the saltwater coastline. The freshwater coastline is deeply grooved into its bedding and is age-old.
The freshwater lake on the site of the present Black Sea’s location is recognizable as freshwater lake by soil samples that
indicate only freshwater animals, molluscs among others, have lived here and also by the remains of plants of the kind that
occur only in fresh water. The current upper coastal waters between the present shoreline and freshwater shoreline, originates
from a time when the Black Sea got connected with the Mediterranean Sea. Here only soil samples exhibit marine life that comes
with a seawater environment. On this basis can be established that the Black Sea basin has not always been connected with the
Mediterranean Sea, as now, but that until a certain moment it was a closed system with fresh water fed by rivers including the
Danube and Dnieper.
Whether in the area between the former freshwater coastline and the current seawater coastline, when this country was dry,
people have lived, is difficult to determine. Some findings with underwater robots indeed seem to point into this direction.
However, only a small part of the bedding is studied -the little rectangle in the above map in the south of the Black Sea- near
a seawater coastal town, known to be inhabited in Neolithic times. Furthermore, only an educated guess is possible. If in the
underlying period of the last glacial people lived around the current Black Sea coast, it may be assumed that these people, or
maybe their family, inhabited the old the country towards the freshwater coastline. In the rolling countryside they have grazed
their herds and perhaps have experimented with the early forms of agriculture.
Göbekli Tepe is a sanctuary from approximately 9,500 bce and is the oldest known temple complex in the world, but it is far
from the Black Sea coast. Çatal Hüyük was an important settlement in the southern part of central Anatolia, dating from around 7,500 bce. Yesilova Höyük near current Izmir in western Anatolia was inhabited from about 6,500 bce. Also at the Black Sea coast
close to now Sinop traces of Neolithic occupation were found which gave rise to archaeological research of the seabed off the
coast near that place with a rov, a robotic submarine.
There has been habitation between the old freshwater coast and the current seawater coast. This country flooded and people had
to find a safe haven for the rising water. This in itself is enough to justify a flood story. The ancients told their tales in
equations and magnified to paint certain aspects clearer, which makes the flood story acceptable based on this event. The debate
between geologists whether the filling of the Black Sea went very gradually in the span of many years, with continuous water
cascades over the Bosporus Dam, or specifically as a sudden catastrophic disaster, is not essential for the development of the
flood story - still assuming that the flood story has a basis in reality and that reality was the Black Sea flood. It is more
dramatic, however, for a reader, especially if, for example, this reader has a Christian background, to believe in a catastrophe
story and the sudden catastrophic rise in sea level, because it goes so well with the catastrophe that is narrated in Noah’s
flood story. Besides, the scientifically verified data also indicate that direction with reasonable certainty.
The Mediterranean flows through the Sea of Marmora towards the Black Sea. Approximately 7,000 bce, just before the final
draining of "Lake Agassiz", the level of the Mediterranean Sea was 115 feet lower than now. This level was sufficient for
the Mediterranean to flow over a submarine threshold, the Dardanelles, to the Sea of Marmora, but not high enough to flow
over the Bosporus Dam to the Black Sea, then having a level of 500 feet below the present level. The water of the Mediterranean
rose, like every sea, and eroded parts of the Bosporus Dam whereupon water spilled over the Bosporus Dam into the Black Sea,
but not yet catastrophic. A catastrophe occurred when the "Etna tsunami" sent a 50 feet high tidal wave direction Bosporus Dam.
The flood broke off a portion of the Bosporus Dam and salt water flowed into the Black Sea. The current dragged off more of the
Bosporus Dam into the waves, so more water could flow through the opening, allowing more Bosporus Dam to be eroded away. This
process grew faster and fiercer. The flooding of the Black Sea therefore can be called a catastrophic flood, a deluge. On the
bottom of the Black Sea erosion traces are observed of an enormous amount of incoming water. These tracks do not run according
to the Coriolis effect, but clockwise - a movement that is more likely based on the local geology. Shortly before 6,000 bce
the flood took placevideo
7).
The "Etna tsunami" took place around 5,800 bce and the breakthrough of the "Bosporus
Dam" with the flooding of the Black Sea around 5,600 bce. Is two hundred years a too large time window for these events to
place on a line of cause and effect? Although the literature presents clearly that the above dates are ‘about’ dates, it is
too easy and too artificial to stretch the dates towards each other based on this approximation - it is not satisfactory.
Although a two hundred years dating used by geologists represents less than a bit of a heartbeat, a thousand years is
geologically barely distinctive, there may be a much more appropriate solution to explain the discrepancy between the two
dates.
The rise in sea level, the flow of water and the erosion of Bosporus Dam is put in a particular sequence by researchers,
after which the year 5,600 bce was calculated for the breakthrough of the Bosporus Dam and hence the probable date of the
catastrophic deluge. Their sequence of events, however, was produced on the basis of a gradual rise in sea level and does
not take the "Etna tsunami" -the forgotten tsunami- into consideration. It is obvious that the breakthrough of the Bosporus
Dam was speeded up precisely because of this tidal wave.
Through the narrow of the Dardanelles, the "Etna tsunami" may have faded somewhat, and then again may have been boosted
caused by the relative shallowness. A tidal wave up to 50 feet was enough for Bosporus Dam to collapse. Moreover, the Bosporus
Dam did not consist of rocky material, but of sediments to a certain degree already waterlogged by rising sea levels. If indeed
the "Etna tsunami" and the breakthrough of the Bosporus Dam thus can be seen as cause and effect, then the date of the
catastrophic cause of the flood can be placed two hundred years further into the past and the tsunami and the breakthrough
then coincide perfectly.
Except for the Black Sea basin, there is another candidate for Noah's residence and therefore for the location of the flood.
In the north or north of Canaan, in now Turkey, in a relatively sharp bend in the Mediterranean coast right in the middle at
the end of a bay, the present town of Dörtyol is located. When one studies the sea bottom in front of this coastal village,
one sees that the seabed for dozens of miles remains quite shallow. The long sharp tip of the island of Cyprus, the Karpaz
Peninsula, points exactly toward the centre of this bay16).
While, as far as is known, no geological or archaeological study of this area is done related to the tsunami that resulted
from the collapse of the eastern flank of Mount Etna, it is not difficult to hypothesize that the flood must have struck here
at least as bad as to the south in Syria, Lebanon and Israel. Possibly even more severe, because into the direction of Dörtyol
the bay is so shallow that the tidal wave must have been pushed up here to an even greater height. That the sharp tip of Cyprus,
a ridge, points precisely into the direction of Dörtyol must also have meant that the tsunami from the northern coast of Cyprus
onwards was funnelled straight for Dörtyol. The ridge on Cyprus also points directly towards the Turkish-Armenian border, the site
where Noah and his ark ran aground on Mount Ağri Daği, Ararat.
On the other hand, although the tidal wave, given the effects elsewhere, must have been monstrous here also, it will not have
been that big a wooden ark was washed from the Mediterranean coast al the way to Turkish-Armenian border - problematic, given
the distance and the intervening mountainous terrain. Also, despite its size, this tsunami must have withdrawn within two or
three days. Much shorter than the twelve months designated in the religious tradition, despite this material cannot be taken
as factual. The "Dörtyol flood" certainly deserves to be investigated in this context, but the tidal wave into the Black Sea
basin by duration and especially by volume remains the likeliest candidate for the catastrophic flood that has most possibly
formed the basis of the story of Noah's flood.
Noah's flood is not historical, because at as proof can be associated with
the mythological narratives. What is demonstrated is the existence of catastrophic tidal waves and floods, and not exclusive
to the area where Noah is believed to have lived. The devastating floods and tidal waves have indeed played within a short time,
between 8,000 and 5,800 bce, but that is not a matter of a global and simultaneous flood. All data considering it can be
determined that the connection between a tsunami in the Black Sea and the story of Noah only can be an assumption. A plausible
assumption, but an assumption nonetheless.
The only undeniable proof that can be given for the existence of Noah at the time of Black Sea Flood is the discovery of a
partially buried settlement or farm at the bottom of the Black Sea with on the fallen fence a nameplate with the name, Noah.
Until this discovery is made, if ever, the reader of the Tanakh, Bible or Koran has to do with an assumption. A tidal wave as
in the Black Sea will have caused hundreds and perhaps thousands of victims. That there has been only one survivor, with his
family, is very unlikely. However, it is obvious that the story of a survivor is used by shamans and priests to convey an
edifying lesson and to emphasize the power of the god they served and to expand on his authority. Noah was possibly such a
shaman, as one of the many alternative survival myth claims.
"The raven's-eye view" The fiction
When we zoom out from all facts and lore,
observe them through our eyelashes and take the perspective of the raven -or a dove- Noah sent out, considering the spectacle
in a bird’s-eye view, then perhaps the following story may be plausible.
On the south coast of the Black Sea, lived a tribal
elder and his wife and family - it was Noah and Naama17)
and their three sons, Shem, the firstborn, Japheth, the middle one, and Ham, the youngest. Shem was married to Zedkatnabu,
Japheth was married to Arathka and Ham was married to Nahalathmahnuk. The women took care of what they had sown and reaped
the land when the crops were ripe. At such a time the men helped when necessary, but they usually were on their way managing
the herds of sheep and goats.
It was Noah who remarked the water of the lake reached higher than normal and that the animals could not be incited to
drink the water. It turned out to be somewhat brackish. This happened every so often in recent years, more frequently than
before actually. From stories that were told in the area from tribal elder to tribal elder, but also from stories of travellers,
Noah knew that the falls of the
"Oxen Pass"18)
were on the rise in intensity. A grim and insecure feeling crept onto Noah, especially now that he saw the water in the lake
was higher than he had seen ever before.
As their tribal elder Noah called a meeting of all heads of families. He put his concern to them. About the water getting
increasingly undrinkable and the rising water levels in the lake. He also told them that he planned to bring his animals to
higher ground much earlier than normal. He sensed something amiss in the air, an air brinier than normal. He felt the warning
in his heart, because the situation was not normal. Once the winter crops were harvested, he told the others, he and his family
with his animals would leave and await the events on the mountain pastures. After much discussion Noah appeared to be the only
one to have interpreted the signs of nature with impending disaster in mind.
Noah, his wife, his sons and their wives, all animals from the herd up to the cage birds, chickens and geese, departed months
earlier than usual to the summer pastures higher in the mountains. The rest of the community remained and a few shook their heads,
when Noah did not see it, over Noah trek with oxen pulled carts, all their belongings piled high upon them. He took everything,
including the horses, donkeys and even the dogs. Nobody understood this arrant move. The signs in nature were different from usual,
of course, but in the eyes of almost everyone else than Noah this was still no basis for a major move like this - it was like a
flight, they found.
It was on the morning of the seventh day of Noah’s trek when he reached the first foothills of the mountains and the ground
beneath his feet shook, growling in a very low hum. Looking back, he saw large clouds on the horizon in the west, cumulating
much faster than he was used to by even the heaviest storms. This was not an earthquake, it continued, it increased in intensity.
Then there was the sound of a strange kind of thunderstorm. A thunder that did not die away, but increased in strength. There
had been no lightning. Noah did not know what to make of all of this. At first he had looked back in amazement. Now he stood
transfixed as he saw huge waves rolling across the country. Shem and Japheth each took him by the arm and pulled him away. They
wanted to climb higher into the mountains, to their summer lodge, because what they saw could still possibly threaten them.
After most of the afternoon alternately climbing with their caravan and looking back in amazement, they arrived at the huts
where they normally only stayed in summer. Three small cabins and a larger, the last as shelter for Ham and Nahalathmahnuk
with the animals. The geese and chickens were released so they could walk around. Especially the geese preferred to stay together,
close to one of the walls. A cold damp wind had risen. In the last light, the women went gathering wood.
Behind the curtain of the night the roaring remained. A strange storm had come, nobody could explain - a storm with no rain,
no lightning, but with a lot of noise like no one had ever lived through or heard of. The night was restless, and sleep came
only with fatigue in the early morning. Had it been in his dreams, or had Noah really heard the screams and desperate cries? He
could not tell.
The next day the view was amazing and horrifying. Where once had been grazing land and arable land was now a big swirling mass
of gray water was sloshing the foothills of the mountains. Contrariwise, the heavens were blue, although the mists above the
turbulent waters wandered through the sky. Occasionally the water came further up the mountain, but then withdrew again. Noah
and his sons went to explore the surrounding area, but they saw no others who had managed to bring themselves to safety.
Some aspects of the Noah story have a deeper
meaning, or they are added later to that effect, or the story of Noah is used to attach other meanings. For example, Noah’s
sons symbolize the emergence of science, literature and architecture - as mankind had to be rebuilt.
Also, from Shem, the Semites
descended, mainly the Jews and the Arabs. From Japheth, the Japhetites descended, the people of Europe. From Ham, the Hamites
descended, the people in Africa and in Canaan.
Regardless of this fact, the Noah story has more connections with other mythologies of the ancient world, than only with the
myth of Atrahasis and the inclusion of this story in the Gilgamish epic. In the Noah story Noah later became a vintner and one
evening he rested drunk and naked on his bed while Ham saw his father Noah - Ham and his descendants are therefore cursed. In
another version of this story, Ham castrated Noah when Noah was sleeping off his intoxication. This version is very similar to
the story of Ouranos who was castrated by his son Kronos. From the blood that flowed Aphrodite was born.
The following story may well be linked to the "Etna tsunami". Kronos's son
was Zeus, the Greek supreme god. He had determined that humanity was
essentially wicked -Lycaon, the king of Arcadia, had sacrificed a boy to
Zeus, who was appalled by this savage offering- and he would flood the world
and start afresh. One couple, however, was chosen to ride out the flood in
an ark and when it was over they would help to repopulate the world. Their
names were Deucalion, son of Prometheus and Clymene, and his wife Pyrrha,
the daughter of Epimetheus and Pandora.
There are more
connections with other mythologies, but these are here not further investigated, because they do not seem to be directly
relevant to the whether or not historicity of Noah. Such twinning, between Abrahamic texts and other mythologies, is only
addressed in this volume when it might be enlightening for the origin of a story.
Besides this, it is quite possible that the flood theme and the destruction of all the foregoing in the world in fact intend
to bury the matriarchal society forever and to irrefutably start the establishment of a new world, a new society with the
patriarch Noah.
The fertility of the crescent
This was the run-up to the discourse about the
Abrahamic triad of religions, Judaism, Christianity and Islam. What happened in the area of the Fertile Crescent during
thousands of years, has had a profound impact on billions of people around the world in the thousands of years thereafter.
The thoughts and ideas of the wise and those who desired wisdom, have affected, determined even, the thoughts of many hundreds
of generations. Quite a responsibility.
In brief the religious beliefs of the people who
lived in Canaan were examined. They are believed to be the ancestors of those who later were called the Israelites, the Jews.
During many centuries they were ancestor worshippers, while in the seventh millennium bce more recognizable deities come
into focus. The most important function was reserved for the primeval mother. Not staggeringly innovative, because throughout
the ancient world this theme was prominent. Not only in the area of the Fertile Crescent -Egypt, Canaan and Mesopotamia, and
a part of Turkey-, but also in the Eurasian region. In the Levant different names -resulting from differences in dialect and
language- the same goddess was addressed.
From Ishtar in Mesopotamia to Isis in Egypt and Asherah or Ashtoreth in Canaan in
between.
The leading position of the primeval woman and primeval goddess seems to have had a counterpart in reality. Until the final
establishment of monotheism with a male deity, the role of women was determining, society organized along matrilineal lines.
In certain important aspects of economic life, but especially in the religious aspect the matriarch was the dominant party.
Perhaps for this reason the story of Noah rather should be called the story of Naama, though it cannot be established that outside
the Levant the matriarch was also more important than the patriarch. The flood story of Noah was somewhat more extensively
examined on these introductory pages. On the one hand because the mythical ‘history’ of this story can be well observed through
different times and in different cultures. From the probably very ancient Atrahasis story, possibly dating from Neolithic Turkey,
through the Mesopotamian Epic of Gilgamish, to the inclusion of this story in the Abrahamic books, the Tanakh, the Christian
Bible and the Holy Koran. On the other hand, based on the flood story it became clear what problems are encountered when for
the stories of the religious books underpinning is sought in historical reality. It mostly comes down to possibilities and
probabilities whereby Noah’s story contrasts in a positive way, because in historical reality an event happened which in
appearance and in dating came well close to the myth.
The remainder of this volume has a more or less fixed structure. Of each book or group of religious books it will be
determined what the historical source may be. If no direct historical grounds are found, it will be established whether
there are historical contextual data which may indicate the grounding of the text in reality. Despite the attention that
thus is given to this aspect of the text, this is not the most important or essential part of the analysis. On the contrary,
for this book is not a historical book. For the writers of the Abrahamic texts in the first instance the historical aspect
was not important either, but rather the persuasiveness of it and often the literary quality of the religious text. They
did not write history, but an edifying and instructional text - it was religion. Because the historicity of religious texts
or figures are of secondary importance to this book, there will less room created for research in this field than with
historicity of Noah’s flood. Ultimately, the historicity is of secondary importance. We saw that the historicity of the event
of the flood showed almost as obvious, but thereby the existence of Noah was not proven, nor became the contents and scope of
the myth more plausible. Therefore, whether or not texts can be regarded as historically correct must rather be seen as a form
of introduction to the text, than there is any other intent. In addition, for the analysis generally those topics and texts are
chosen that can be found in the Jewish Tanakh, as well as in the Christian Bible and in the Muslim Koran.
Following the brief historical introduction an analysis of the text itself will be presented. In this respect the following
research questions are important. What exactly is written and what message is or seems to be expressed? What were, as far as
can be ascertained, the effects on people in that historical period? What if any of these are the consequences for present day
man? Should present day man take heed of texts and regulations that were written one and a half to two and a half-millennium
ago? The last question is a not insignificant derived question, because -philosophical- thinking has not stalled since the
origins of the ancient texts.
The third and final aspect of the analysis places the texts within the scope of this book. Is man asked to explore his inner
self, walking his inner road? Are man’s considerations informed or deformed? In short, how do the texts hold in relation to
the Luciwher paradigm?